Sweeping Changes Ahead For The CMBS (Conduit Loan) Industry

Sweeping Changes Ahead For The CMBS (Conduit Loan)  Industry – The US Treasury is planning a sweeping overhaul of the securitization industry to require lenders to retain part of the credit risk of loans sold to investors and put an end to the gain-on-sale accounting rules that fueled the crisis. The overhaul aims to restore confidence in asset-backed markets and allow them to resume supplying credit to the economy without re-creating systemic risks. Securitization of assets – such as mortgages and credit card loans – accounted for about half of the credit markets before the collapse last year.  Bankers warned that the new rules would reduce the incentives to package assets into securities, and raising financing costs. “It’s the beginning of the unwinding of the securitization for-sale model”, a senior Wall Street banker said. “By forcing lenders to keep part of the loans and discarding “gain-for-sale”, the government will raise the cost of capital and put a damper on the recovery of the credit markets”.

 

Under the plan, originators will be required to retain at least 5% of the credit risk, and would ensure that lenders have some “skin in the game”. The proposed elimination of “gain on sale accounting” would prevent financial companies from booking paper profits on loans – packaged into securities as soon as they were sold to investors. The Treasury plan would also bar credit rating agencies from assigning the same types of ratings to credit structured products that are assigned to corporate and sovereign bonds. In addition, issuers of asset-backed securities would be required to disclose loan-level data and compensation for the broker, originator and securitizer on an ongoing basis to investors and rating agencies. Banks would only be able to record income from securitization over time as the underlying assets perform, rather than upfront at the time of securitization. Broker fees and commissions would also be disbursed over time rather than up-front, and would be reduced if an asset performed badly due to sloppy underwriting. Sponsors would be required to stand behind their securities by providing warranties as to the origination and the underwriting standards on their loans. Credit rating agencies – mainly paid by the issuers to rate their securities, would also have to strengthen their policies to avoid conflicts of interest (it’s about time!!).
 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.